作者：安辛 来源：原创 发布日期：08-22
A | "Social media is now the main source of information about the world for 16-24-year-olds, and for all ethnic minorities in the UK," explained Ellis Cashmore, honorary professor of sociology at Aston University in the UK.,"Yet platform moderators have practically unrestricted power to edit, and, if they wish, remove content. This is an unheard-of censorial power. I can't think that, in history, proprietors have ever had such colossal power to control the flow and content of information, not just to one population, but to the world.",The Online Safety Bill was first introduced in the British Parliament in March 2022 with the aim of holding social media platforms, search engines and various websites to account for hosting illegal activities or spreading harmful content.,The newly introduced amendment is "designed to guard against the arbitrary removal of articles from journalists at recognized news outlets when shared on social media platforms," according to the UK government's website. The authors of the amendment draw attention to the fact that half of British adults use social media for news, with Facebook*, Twitter and Instagram* being the most popular platforms. When it comes to 16-24 year-olds, the internet is the most-used platform.,Once the bill comes into force, social media giants would be required "to ensure recognized news publishers’ articles remain viewable and accessible on their sites even if they are under review by moderators.",Facebook Doesn't Know What Happens to Users' Data, How It Spreads as Regulators Tighten Their Grip27 April, 19:01 GMT,The introduction of the new amendment can be explained by the fact that the tech giants have proved themselves impossible to control, the professor explained.,"Tech companies operate in a relatively unrestricted way and governments around the world usually rely on the companies' goodwill," he said.,Still, the new amendment is focused on so-called "category one companies", which include "the largest and most popular social media platforms", and is not designed to shield alternative media sources.,The bill's selective approach has been manifested by its earlier amendment obligating social media platforms "to proactively look for and remove disinformation from foreign state actors which harm the UK." It specifically singles out Russian news, with an obvious reference to Sputnik News and RT - both previously banned by the EU and social media giants after the beginning of the Russian special operation to de-militarize and de-Nazify Ukraine.,"Freedom of speech and expression are highly valued principles in western Europe and North America," says Cashmore. "But it is interesting that, after the beginning of the conflict in Ukraine, there were no protests at the decisions of western governments to prohibit broadcasts and news supplies from RT, Sputnik and maybe a few less important news outlets.",EU Bans Work of Sputnik News Sites, Broadcasting of RT TV Channel in the Community From 2 March2 March, 11:53 GMT,The professor notes that wiping Russian news from the media sphere is senseless given that many westerners are interested in learning Russian perspectives. "This does not mean they would be persuaded or even influenced, but they feel entitled to make up their own minds independently. They have been denied that facility," Cashmore stressed.,"Since February, Russia, its people and its values have been condemned, denounced and stigmatized," said the professor. "Vladimir Putin has been personally vilified. It is difficult to see this ending, at least not for 30 years. Russia has been excluded from many world affairs and many believe Russia and the other BRICS countries may coalesce into an international configuration to rival NATO. This would become a new world order.",Meanwhile, the bill's amendments have raised concerns among British campaigners who are warning the government that in its current form the proposed internet safety laws are “on the verge of being unworkable," according to The Independent.,In particular, campaigners have advocated for a number of measures to strengthen freedom of expression and rights safeguards to better protect people from marginalized backgrounds and expand transparency requirements on firms to boost access to data for researchers and academics.,*Facebook and Instagram are banned in Russia over extremist activities.。
B | 讯 据民政部消息，民政部社会组织管理局通报5起社会团体分支机构、代表机构违法典型案例。 社会团体分支机构、代表机构是社会团体的重要组成部分，其运行质量直接关系到社会团体的整体效能，直接影响行业治理和社会服务的实际效果。近年来，社会团体违反规定设立分支机构、代表机构，或者对分支机构、代表机构疏于管理，造成严重后果的案件时有发生。有的在分支机构、代表机构下再设分支机构、代表机构；有的设立地域性分支机构；有的超出章程规定的宗旨和业务范围设立分支机构；有的对分支机构管理不严，致其出现违法违规问题等，扰乱了社会组织登记管理秩序，损害了社会组织公信力，侵害了人民群众合法权益。为发挥以案释法、以案示警作用，现选取部分典型案例予以通报。
C | 案例一：中华人民共和国国史学会违反规定设立分支机构、代表机构案 中华人民共和国国史学会在其分支机构两弹一星历史研究分会下再设立无锡办事处、贵州办事处两个代表机构，承担联络会员单位、保障服务对象、组织相关活动等任务，该行为违反了《民政部关于贯彻落实国务院取消全国性社会团体分支机构、代表机构登记行政审批项目的决定有关问题的通知》第四条“社会团体不得设立地域性分支机构，不得在分支机构、代表机构下再设立分支机构、代表机构”的规定。2025年10月，依据《社会团体登记管理条例》（2016年修订）第三十条第一款第五项的规定，民政部依法对中华人民共和国国史学会作出警告的行政处罚。 案例二：北京宜春企业商会违反规定设立分支机构案 北京宜春企业商会为搭建宜春高安市在京企业家平台，在商会下设高安分会。
D | 2023年12月，北京宜春企业商会在履行理事会、会员大会等程序后，决定成立高安分会。北京市民政局在年检中发现该违法情形后，向该商会提出整改要求。2025年1月，该商会按要求履行整改程序，召开理事会及会员大会，决议取消高安分会并停止铜鼓分会、袁州分会成立筹备工作。北京宜春企业商会设立高安分会的行为，违反了《社会团体登记管理条例》（2016年修订）第十七条第二款“社会团体不得设立地域性的分支机构”的规定。
E | 2025年6月，依据《社会团体登记管理条例》（2016年修订）第三十条第一款第五项的规定，北京市民政局依法对北京宜春企业商会作出警告的行政处罚。 案例三：山西省晋绥边区历史文化研究会超出业务范围开展活动、不按照规定办理变更登记、违反规定设立分支机构案 山西省晋绥边区历史文化研究会未召开理事会或常务理事会研究通过，违规设立分支机构岚县红色文化专委会；同时还存在超出章程规定的宗旨和业务范围进行活动、住所变更后未按规定向登记管理机关申请变更登记的行为。
F | 上述行为违反了《社会团体登记管理条例》（2016年修订）第十八条第一款“社会团体的登记事项需要变更的，应当自业务主管单位审查同意之日起30日内，向登记管理机关申请变更登记”、《社会团体分支机构、代表机构登记办法》第三条“社会团体设立分支机构、代表机构应当按照章程的规定，履行民主程序”等规定。
G | 2026年3月，依据《社会团体登记管理条例》（2016年修订）第三十条第一款第二项、第四项、第五项等规定，山西省民政厅依法对山西省晋绥边区历史文化研究会作出停止活动六个月的行政处罚，并责令撤换直接负责的主管人员。 案例四：项城防水协会违反规定设立分支机构案 项城防水协会擅自跨区域设立项城防水协会青海分会，后者在青海省西宁市违规发展会员并收取会费。
H | 上述行为违反了《社会团体登记管理条例》（2026年修订）第十七条第二款“社会团体不得设立地域性的分支机构”的规定。项城市民政局与业务主管单位联合对该协会负责人进行约谈，责令其限期整改。协会按要求撤销项城防水协会青海分会，并对该机构办公场所牌匾进行拆除，开展财务清算，收缴各类档案资料和印章。2026年7月，依据《社会团体登记管理条例》（2026年修订）第三十条第一款第六项的规定，河南省周口市项城市民政局依法对项城防水协会作出警告的行政处罚。
I | 案例五：河北省民营经济发展促进会对代表机构疏于管理案 河北省民营经济发展促进会下属代表机构雄安办事处未经该促进会同意，私自发展会员并收取费用。该促进会未严格履行监管主体责任，对其代表机构日常活动审批、过程管控等关键环节监管措施落实不到位，疏于管理造成严重后果。上述行为违反了《社会团体登记管理条例》（2016年修订）第十七条第一款“ 社会团体的分支机构、代表机构是社会团体的组成部分，不具有法人资格，应当按照其所属于的社会团体的章程所规定的宗旨和业务范围，在该社会团体授权的范围内开展活动、发展会员”的规定。2026年2月，依据《社会团体登记管理条例》（2016年修订）第三十条第一款第五项的规定，河北省民政厅依法对河北省民营经济发展促进会作出警告的行政处罚，并责令撤换代表机构负责人。版权申明：凡注有“”或电头为“”的稿件，均为独家版权所有，未经许可不得转载或镜像；授权转载必须注明来源为“”，并保留“”的电头。 。
Current article:http://934nemr.cuancuguanzhongnieqinyazhun.cyou/d3i51y/nkr0a.html
Published on:20:02:49